[WLANware] Upgrade to 1.7.0 and Two routers connected via cable

Sven-Ola Tuecke sven-ola at gmx.de
Sun Jun 13 17:57:07 CEST 2010


Hey Jan,

I wasn't on deck last week. I presume, you have sorted out the situation. 
The solution is to add the *mesh network range" to the "Admin/OLSR/Range" 
setting aka. ff_range. The /rom/etc/init.d/S14nvram script should convert 
this automatically - but that works only if the former network iface config 
allows this. If it's still not working for you do not hesitate to 
write/query once more.

// Sven-Ola

"Jan Groenewald" <jan at aims.ac.za> schrieb im Newsbeitrag 
news:<mailman.25.1275741251.13296.wlanware at freifunk.net>...
> Hi
>
> On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 02:11:45PM +0200, jan at aims.ac.za wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I used to have two routers connected via cable
> > on the wan interface and ran olsr on there for
> > the best routing (in a mesh of 100 nodes
> > these were two "high sites" on the mountain
> > pointing to different neighbourhoods.
> >
> > I upgraded one to 1.7.0 today and wan_proto=olsr
> > is no longer available, not even allowed.
> >
> > root at alan:~# ifup wan
> > ### WARNING vlan1: proto olsr not supported
> >
> > What is the new solution?
>
> I found this in the Changelog, which I think I read earlier but forgot.
>
>
> + Basti complains about that pre-defined WIFIOLSR=1 and
>   in Vienna, they use a second mesh network range. For that
>   reason new setting on OLSR page: ff_range. Defaults to WLAN
>   address range. Determines interfaces for OLSR and firewall.
>   Removed (lan/wan)_proto=olsr, chg to "static" in S14ffnvram.
>   Changed startup files and old /usr/bin/netparam accordingly.
>
> I still do not understand the new preferred solution, or what this
> second range or ff_range is.
>
> I downgraded the two nodes in the meantime.
>
> regards,
> Jan
>
>
> -- 
>    .~.
>    /V\     Jan Groenewald
>   /( )\    www.aims.ac.za
>   ^^-^^ 




More information about the WLANware mailing list