<div dir="auto"><div>Jep, sogar noch besser.<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Gefühlt gefällt mir remote besser, objektiv ist Peer vermutlich richtiger.</div><div dir="auto">Und auch local wäre zur Vollständigkeit super. :)</div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Adrian Schmutzler <<a href="mailto:mail@adrianschmutzler.de">mail@adrianschmutzler.de</a>> schrieb am Mo., 19. Aug. 2019, 15:20:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div lang="DE" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div class="m_4259852470035768063WordSection1"><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">Man könnte auch noch über peer_public_key nachdenken.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">Und dann müsste man eigentlich auch local_private_key nehmen.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">Finde den Patch aber gut, das hat beim ersten Gateway-Setup die Leute immer verwirrt.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">Grüße<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">Adrian<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt"><div><div style="border:none;border-top:solid #e1e1e1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm"><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> franken-dev [mailto:<a href="mailto:franken-dev-bounces@freifunk.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">franken-dev-bounces@freifunk.net</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Alexander Gutzeit<br><b>Sent:</b> Sonntag, 18. August 2019 09:20<br><b>To:</b> Fabian Bläse <<a href="mailto:fabian@blaese.de" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">fabian@blaese.de</a>><br><b>Cc:</b> Ich <<a href="mailto:alexander.gutzeit@web.de" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">alexander.gutzeit@web.de</a>>; franken-dev <<a href="mailto:franken-dev@freifunk.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">franken-dev@freifunk.net</a>><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [PATCH] fff-wireguard: rename public_key to public_remote_key<u></u><u></u></span></p></div></div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Hi Fabian, :)<u></u><u></u></p><div><div><p class="MsoNormal">Fabian Bläse <<a href="mailto:fabian@blaese.de" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">fabian@blaese.de</a>> schrieb am Sa., 17. Aug. 2019, 22:34:<u></u><u></u></p></div><blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm"><p class="MsoNormal">Hey Alex,<br><br>gute Idee. Mehr solche Patches, solange wir noch nicht an bestimmten Variablennamen fest hängen!<br>Ich würde die Variable remote_public_key nennen.<u></u><u></u></p></blockquote></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">Finde ich auch sehr gut, wenn nicht sogar besser. :):)<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p></div><div><div><blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm"><p class="MsoNormal"><br>Irgendwas ist aber bei deiner E-Mail aber schief gegangen, da ist bisschen "3D"-Zeichensalat drin.<u></u><u></u></p></blockquote></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">Tjooooo, ich bin ja froh, dass meine Mail überhaupt irgendwie raus gegangen ist. ;)<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">Verbesserungen oder Neuversuche gibt's wenn ich genug Zeit hab meine History nachzuvollziehen oder ich wieder mit nemm "Eingeweihten" zusammen sitze. ;)<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">LG Alex. ;)<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p></div><div><div><blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm"><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>Gruß<br>Fabian<br><br>On 17.08.19 00:36, Alexander Gutzeit wrote:<br>> From: Alexander Gutzeit <<a href="mailto:alexgutfried@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">alexgutfried@gmail.com</a>><br>> <br>> public_key could be confusing which public key should be used.<br>> public_remote_key should be more clearly.<br>> <br>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gutzeit <<a href="mailto:alexander.gutzeit@web.de" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">alexander.gutzeit@web.de</a>><br>> =2D--<br>> .../fff/fff-wireguard/files/etc/gateway.d/50-wireguard | 4 ++--<br>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)<br>> <br>> diff --git a/src/packages/fff/fff-wireguard/files/etc/gateway.d/50-wiregua=<br>> rd b/src/packages/fff/fff-wireguard/files/etc/gateway.d/50-wireguard<br>> index b2e876d..4df3030 100644<br>> =2D-- a/src/packages/fff/fff-wireguard/files/etc/gateway.d/50-wireguard<br>> +++ b/src/packages/fff/fff-wireguard/files/etc/gateway.d/50-wireguard<br>> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ configure() {<br>> uci set gateway.$name.private_key=3D"$privkey"<br>> fi<br>> <br>> - if ! pubkey=3D$(uci get gateway.$name.public_key); then<br>> + if ! pubkey=3D$(uci get gateway.$name.public_remote_key); then<br>> echo "ERROR: publickey for ${name} missing!"<br>> exit 1<br>> fi<br>> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ configure() {<br>> cfg=3D$(uci add network wireguard_$prefixname)<br>> fi<br>> <br>> - uci set network.$cfg.public_key=3D"$pubkey"<br>> + uci set network.$cfg.public_remote_key=3D"$pubkey"<br>> uci set network.$cfg.endpoint_host=3D"$endpoint_host"<br>> uci set network.$cfg.endpoint_port=3D"$endpoint_port"<br>> uci set network.$cfg.persistent_keepalive=3D"$persistent_keepalive"<br>> =2D-<br>> 2.17.1<br>> <u></u><u></u></p></blockquote></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div></div></div>